When you’re starting to drown between employee concerns, payroll duties and helping your CEO -- HR Insider is there to help get the logistical work out of the way.
Need a policy because of a recent regulatory change? We’ve got it for you. Need some quick training on a specific HR topic? We’ve got it for you. HR Insider provides the resources you need to craft, implement and monitor policies with confidence. Our team of experts (which includes lawyers, analysts and HR professionals) keep track of complex legislation, pending changes, new interpretations and evolving case law to provide you with the policies and procedures to keep you ahead of problems. FIND OUT MORE...
Court Of Appeal Sends Expensive Message To Employer For Termination Post-Medical Leave

The recent decision of Krmpotic v. Thunder Bay Electronics Limited, 2024 ONCA 332, involves an employee with 30 years of service that was terminated the day he returned from a medical leave following back surgery.

Trial Decision

The trial judge awarded the employee a 24 month notice period and made a finding that the employee was medically incapable of mitigating his damages during the notice period. The trial judge also awarded the employee $50,000 in aggravated damages because the employer had terminated the employee in a manner that breached its duty of good faith and to operate in a reasonable, honest and candid manner.

Court of Appeal Decision

The employer appealed the finding with respect to the employee's inability to mitigate as the employee had presented no expert medical evidence to prove that he was unable to work. Instead, the employee relied on testimony from himself and family members to establish that his physical condition precluded him from performing the physical requirements of his occupation. The employer also appealed the award of aggravated damages as the employee provided no medical evidence to establish that the manner of termination caused significant mental distress. The employer argued that there was no evidence that the employee suffered mental distress beyond the normal hurt expected from being terminated.

The Ontario Court of Appeal rejected both of the employer's arguments. The Court held that there was no requirement to establish physical incapacity only by expert medical evidence. The Court found that it was reasonable for the trial judge to rely on the evidence presented during the trial to conclude that the employee was physically unable to mitigate. The Court also rejected the employer's arguments with respect to aggravated damages. The Court held that insensitive conduct in the manner of dismissal is a breach of the duty of good faith which can warrant aggravated damages.

Takeaways

This decision highlights the risks that an employer can face when terminating an employee immediately upon their return from a medical leave. Not only can an employer face additional human rights or aggravated damages, but the employee may also be able to circumvent the duty to mitigate based on their own evidence that they are physically incapable of mitigating during the reasonable notice period.

Originally published Jul 10

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Author: Rachel Goldenberg

Goulart