When you’re starting to drown between employee concerns, payroll duties and helping your CEO -- HR Insider is there to help get the logistical work out of the way.
Need a policy because of a recent regulatory change? We’ve got it for you. Need some quick training on a specific HR topic? We’ve got it for you. HR Insider provides the resources you need to craft, implement and monitor policies with confidence. Our team of experts (which includes lawyers, analysts and HR professionals) keep track of complex legislation, pending changes, new interpretations and evolving case law to provide you with the policies and procedures to keep you ahead of problems. FIND OUT MORE...
Overtime Pay: An Employment Class Action Authorized In Madden c. Nordia Inc.

On March 18, 2024, Superior Court Justice Lukasz Granosik authorized a class action based on Québec's Act Respecting Labour Standards (the Act) following an application regarding an overtime pay calculation.

Grounds for authorization: the decision

In Madden c. Nordia Inc. (2024 QCCS 861), the plaintiff alleges that Nordia, a customer service company, failed to pay overtime at the proper rate by basing its calculation on a percentage of the base hourly rate rather than the regular hourly rate, which includes various bonuses.

The plaintiff argues that this constitutes misrepresentation on Nordia's part and that the bonuses should be included in the calculation of overtime pay, even though this is not explicitly stated in the company's employment contracts.

In addition, the plaintiff claims that Nordia is not complying with the Act by failing to calculate public holidays and overtime pay based on anything other than the base salary.

The judge referred to case law to note that not all hourly bonuses should be excluded from the calculation and specified that only those related to inconveniences of performing work should be excluded under Section 55 of the Act. He concluded that this issue will require further examination at trial, as the authorization should be limited to establishing a mere possibility of success on the merits and not to presenting a realistic or reasonable chance of winning.

Key takeaways

While class actions in employment law prove relatively rare in Québec, this decision provides a good example of the collective risk employers face if they fail to fulfill their obligations under the Act or employment contracts, even in non-union contexts.

In this particular case, Judge Granosik's decision is a reminder that employers should clearly define in their employment contracts the distinction between bonuses related to inconveniences suffered in the course of work and those linked to the employee or their role. Only the former are excluded from overtime calculations.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Authors: Justine Laurier, Anne Merminod, Samuel Roy

BLG