When you’re starting to drown between employee concerns, payroll duties and helping your CEO -- HR Insider is there to help get the logistical work out of the way.
Need a policy because of a recent regulatory change? We’ve got it for you. Need some quick training on a specific HR topic? We’ve got it for you. HR Insider provides the resources you need to craft, implement and monitor policies with confidence. Our team of experts (which includes lawyers, analysts and HR professionals) keep track of complex legislation, pending changes, new interpretations and evolving case law to provide you with the policies and procedures to keep you ahead of problems. FIND OUT MORE...
Answer for terminating-a-contract-employee

Direct from our payroll, expert: Hope this helps. Glenn
You’d have to look at the exact terms of the contract, but SK seems to be an exception to the rule that notice is not normally required for a person hired as an employee with a fixed-term contract.
Subject to what the contract actually says, I would expect the employer is liable for the greater of the remaining contract term and the notice required under the SK employment standards.
For example, if the contract is a simple one that says the person will be employed for XX months, at a fixed salary of YY dollars per month, and there are no provisions for ending the contract before these months expire, then the person is owed the salary for those months.
I would also add that the employee does not have to sue in the courts to have the contract enforced. The SK employment standards can write an order enforcing the payment of any monies owing under a contract of employment.

Alan R. McEwen
Alan McEwen & Associates
855 Berwick Road South, Qualicum Beach, BC  V9K 1R3
250-228-5280 in the Pacific time zone